- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 107
- Section 2, Question 19
Scientists have long known that the soft surface(465 more words not shown)
Which one of the following(15 more words not shown)
- ATo determine the(20 more words not shown)
- BTo determine whether(24 more words not shown)
- CTo determine whether(18 more words not shown)
- DA fisherman catches(19 more words not shown)
- EA game warden(19 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
What did Scheich actually test? He suspected that the platypus detected prey through electric fields. He supplied that cue with a battery, then watched for the animal's response. Our rough prediction is an experiment that supplies a suspected sensory cue to test an animal's ability.
Working the answers
- A
Decoys and calls are used to investigate mating habits, but no particular sensory mechanism for detecting prey is being tested. That misses the more specific structure of Scheich's experiment.
- B
This initially looks promising: a researcher tests a proposed ability by supplying a stimulus. But it concerns navigation through echoes, not detecting prey. Playing cries also isn't the same as providing the returning echoes named in the hypothesis.
- CCorrect
This is the closer match. Heat sensitivity takes the place of electrical sensitivity, and the heat-generating object takes the place of the battery. In each case, an artificial source supplies the suspected cue to test whether the animal uses it to detect prey. C adds the hunting connection that B lacks.
- D
The fisherman is trying to catch fish, not testing a hypothesis about their sensory abilities. Using an artificial lure alone doesn't reproduce the experimental purpose.
- E
The warden is also capturing an animal, using actual food as bait. There's no experiment testing which sensory cue helps it find prey.
More Analogy questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Analogy questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.