PrepTest 136, Section 3, Question 21

DetailDifficulty2 of 5
Passage 4Moral duties under philosophical anarchism
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 136

Most people acknowledge that not all governments have(453 more words not shown)

The author identifies which one(8 more words not shown)

Reading the passage

The commonly held belief appears in the opening, before the theory is introduced: exceptions aside, people generally have a moral duty to obey a law simply because it is a law. The author is reporting that view, not asking us to agree with it. Keep it separate from philosophical anarchism, which then denies that duty.

Working the answers

  • A
    Correct

    This restates the opening's idea that a law's legal status itself creates an ethical obligation to follow it (paragraph 1). In most cases matches the qualification that immoral laws can create exceptions. The belief concerns legal status itself, not just whether a particular law has a good purpose.

  • B

    Moral equality among all governments is a consequence the critics attribute to philosophical anarchism. It isn't identified as the commonly held belief, and the author explains why the theory doesn't require it.

  • C

    Participation in making a law is never given as the condition for a duty to obey it. The discussion doesn't establish that rule.

  • D

    Some legal conventions, such as which side to drive on, aren't inherently moral choices. That doesn't establish a commonly held belief that most crimes are morally neutral.

  • E

    Nothing says most existing laws are intended to prevent harm. The author's later argument about duties not to harm people isn't a count of the purposes behind existing laws.

More Detail questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Detail questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.