PrepTest 136, Section 3, Question 22

Author's OpinionDifficulty3 of 5
Passage 4Moral duties under philosophical anarchism
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 136

Most people acknowledge that not all governments have(453 more words not shown)

The author's stance regarding the(12 more words not shown)

Reading the passage

The author defends philosophical anarchism against two criticisms and explains why some of its distinctions make sense. That's a favorable treatment. But the argument stops short of enthusiastic endorsement of the entire theory. We should predict qualified acceptance, while keeping the critics' hostile reactions separate from the author's response.

Working the answers

  • A

    Ardent approval of most aspects would require a much stronger endorsement. Showing that two attacks fail doesn't establish that the author enthusiastically approves of the theory broadly.

  • B
    Correct

    Apparent acceptance of some basic positions fits the defense. The author treats the distinctions between legal authority and moral worth, and between duties to government and duties to people, as legitimate. This recognizes the favorable stance without exaggerating its reach.

  • C

    The author doesn't worry that the theory may be unable to avoid the critics' extreme consequences. The argument explains why those consequences don't follow.

  • D

    No central feature is rejected. This reverses the direction of the author's response to the criticism.

  • E

    Antipathy means hostility, and the author isn't hostile to the theory. This would confuse the commentators' objections with the defense the author provides.

More Author's Opinion questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Author's Opinion questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.