- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 147
- Section 3, Question 25
Passage A In 1994, Estonia became the first(490 more words not shown)
Passage A(253 more words not shown)
Passage B(245 more words not shown)
Which one of the following(15 more words not shown)
- Athat exempting a(9 more words not shown)
- Bthat flat tax(8 more words not shown)
- Cthat higher taxes(8 more words not shown)
- Dthat a flat(11 more words not shown)
- Ethat a progressive(10 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
Separate the authors’ positions from the topics they address. B can address a claim by rejecting it. We need a conclusion A supports that B leaves alone.
What we’re looking for
The threshold and fairness arguments appear in both. Tax avoidance is different: A uses it to explain high earners’ actual payments, while B focuses on equal treatment, financial needs, and who supplies the revenue.
Working the answers
- A
A uses the exempt threshold to answer the fairness objection, but B expressly considers that exemption and questions the jump from zero to the top rate. Disagreement is not silence.
- B
A argues that flat taxes are working in practice. This reverses its position.
- C
Neither argument develops a claim about high-income tax rates inhibiting investment or economic growth. That may sound familiar from tax debates, but it is not a conclusion A argues for here.
- DCorrect
A connects complex codes with large opportunities and incentives for high earners to avoid taxes, and contrasts that situation with flat regimes. B never addresses this avoidance argument. It satisfies both requirements: supported by A and unaddressed by B.
- E
B directly addresses whether graduated taxes are unfair to those who pay more, explaining that equivalent income layers face equal rates. A also does not argue for the unfairness claim as stated.
More Author's Opinion questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Author's Opinion questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.