- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 145
- Section 3, Question 3
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), approved(426 more words not shown)
The author's stance toward the(10 more words not shown)
- Aunbridled(1 more words not shown)
- Bqualified(1 more words not shown)
- Cabsolute(1 more words not shown)
- Dreluctant(1 more words not shown)
- Estrong(1 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
Our main-point prediction already gives us the attitude: the UDHR made an important contribution, but its nonbinding status is a serious weakness. The author ultimately says it deserves recognition. We need approval that leaves room for that reservation.
Working the answers
- A
Unbridled enthusiasm would leave no significant reservation. Calling the lack of binding force the most regrettable weakness rules that out.
- BCorrect
Approval fits the recognition of international standards and later binding conventions. Qualified means that approval has a limit or reservation: the declaration itself is nonbinding. Both halves of the answer match the final paragraph.
- C
The author is not merely reporting events without taking a position. Calling the document progressive and saying it deserves recognition are favorable judgments, while identifying a regrettable weakness is a criticism.
- D
The author does not reject the declaration. Its limitations are followed by reasons to recognize its value, so the ultimate direction is positive.
- E
Strong hostility is even farther from that conclusion. The account acknowledges a flaw without attacking the document as worthless or harmful.
More Author's Opinion questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Author's Opinion questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.