- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 139
- Section 2, Question 16
Most scholars of Mexican American history mark César(461 more words not shown)
The passage indicates that the(13 more words not shown)
- Aboth had roots(6 more words not shown)
- Bboth were studied(6 more words not shown)
- Cboth were initially(3 more words not shown)
- Dboth often involved(1 more words not shown)
- Eboth were part(4 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
We need a feature supported for both forms. The early actos developed from workers' experiences and were meant to satirize the opposition. Carpas were informal shows described as often satirical. That gives us a shared use of satire, even though their settings and histories differed.
Working the answers
- A
Valdez's European training influenced the actos. We aren't told that carpas had European roots. A feature associated with one contributor to the actos cannot automatically be assigned to the earlier form.
- B
Valdez had belonged to the San Francisco Mime Troupe. That doesn't establish that the troupe studied both actos and carpas.
- C
Actos began at the fields' edges; carpas were performed in tents. A tent could stand on a farm, but the author doesn't place these tents there. We cannot fill in the location ourselves.
- DCorrect
Actos should “satirize the opposition,” and carpas are described as “often satirical.” Those two statements provide support for both sides of the comparison.
- E
Actos were used in union organizing. Carpas had mainly working-class audiences, but working-class does not mean unionized, and we aren't told those shows were part of organizing drives.
More Detail questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Detail questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.