PrepTest 125, Section 3, Question 6

Author's OpinionDifficulty4 of 5
Passage 1Thurgood Marshall’s innovations in public interest litigation
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 125

Most of what has been written about Thurgood(466 more words not shown)

Based on the passage, it(17 more words not shown)

Reading the passage

We have several facts about Marshall's methods and influence, but this broad question doesn't give us a specific claim to predict. For each choice, check the whole statement. A familiar first half doesn't support a new claim added at the end.

Working the answers

  • A

    His strategic innovations have received too little attention, but we aren't told that his Supreme Court accomplishments have been undervalued too.

  • B

    No method is ranked as both the most controversial and the most successful. The account mentions criticism and effectiveness without making those comparisons.

  • C

    We aren't told whether lawyers representing private interests had previously used sociological evidence. Calling Marshall innovative doesn't settle every earlier use in another setting.

  • D

    The number of public interest firms grew; they weren't first invented in response to his successes. The opening even says the NAACP wasn't the first organization driven by a political and social agenda. Going from some firms to many isn't going from none to one.

  • E
    Correct

    The final paragraph describes his techniques serving consumer advocacy and conservative causes, and notes the “divergent political objectives.” Methods developed for one campaign can therefore serve purposes beyond what their originator might have intended.

More Author's Opinion questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Author's Opinion questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.