PrepTest 125, Section 1, Question 24

Author's OpinionDifficulty5 of 5
Passage 4Group cohesion, candid discussion, and the risk of groupthink
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 125

In principle, a cohesive group—one whose members generally(440 more words not shown)

It can be inferred from(31 more words not shown)

Reading the passage

The researchers identify a recurring pattern: overconfidence, closed-mindedness, pressure for agreement, and suppression of doubts. The author uses those findings in the discussion of cohesion and groupthink. We're looking for a statement both would accept, so let's check the choices against that shared material.

Working the answers

  • A

    “All” conflicts with the final distinction: cohesion is necessary but not sufficient. Strong cohesion can allow effective decision making instead.

  • B

    The researchers identify a “recurring pattern” involving several factors. Nothing says the causes are unique to every case.

  • C

    The final sentence expressly calls for identifying the additional factors that determine whether cohesion deteriorates into groupthink. Further study isn't dismissed as fruitless.

  • D

    Being closed-minded to warnings doesn't establish complete immunity to outside information. “Cannot influence” goes beyond the described resistance.

  • E
    Correct

    This captures their shared negative assessment. Groupthink damages critical thinking and judgment, so neither the author nor these researchers would generally expect it to improve a group's decisions. “On balance” also avoids the unnecessary claim that a group affected by it could never make a good decision.

More Author's Opinion questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Author's Opinion questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.