- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 125
- Section 1, Question 27
In principle, a cohesive group—one whose members generally(440 more words not shown)
Based on the passage, it(18 more words not shown)
- AHighly cohesive groups(17 more words not shown)
- BIt is difficult(21 more words not shown)
- CA group with(28 more words not shown)
- DIntense stress and(11 more words not shown)
- ENoncohesive groups can,(10 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
We have several claims to work with: cohesion can let people speak candidly, it can also enable groupthink, and additional factors determine which outcome occurs. This question leaves the subject open, so we don't need to force a more specific prediction before seeing the choices. We need an inference that respects those distinctions.
Working the answers
- A
Nothing compares the negotiating styles of cohesive and noncohesive groups. Internal trust doesn't establish how a group treats adversaries.
- BCorrect
When cohesion is low, members may hold back because they fear recrimination. That makes it harder for the group to hear objections and critically examine its options. A fairly high level of cohesion helps create the freedom needed for that examination.
Notice the limited claim: it says examination is difficult without cohesion. It doesn't say impossible, and it doesn't promise that cohesion guarantees good critical thinking. The entire groupthink discussion warns against that second leap.
- C
Generally trusting other members is different from sharing their view on a particular issue. The first paragraph values the freedom to express disagreement, so we can't infer that varied viewpoints make a sound decision less likely.
- D
Stress and high expectations aren't identified as the key causes. The writer says additional determining factors still need to be identified.
- E
This conflicts with the stated requirement that cohesion be present for groupthink. The qualification “under certain circumstances” doesn't remove that requirement.
More Author's Opinion questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Author's Opinion questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.