- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 105
- Section 3, Question 21
Despite the great differences among the cultures from(438 more words not shown)
The primary purpose of the(3 more words not shown)
- Aillustrate a general(10 more words not shown)
- Billuminate a point(7 more words not shown)
- Csummarize the achievements(5 more words not shown)
- Dprovoke a discussion(13 more words not shown)
- Erefute a prevailing(9 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
The discussion keeps returning to two competing pulls: borrowing from other literatures and expressing Hispanic-American lives and voices. The novel examples show the competing standards; the history shows their changing influence; the ending shows writers still dealing with both.
What we’re looking for
For the purpose, we're looking for what the writer does with that tension.
Working the answers
- A
This would make Hispanic-American literature an example of a general problem affecting literature. The writer doesn't establish that broader claim. We shouldn't extend this particular discussion to literature as a whole.
- BCorrect
The point of tension is cosmopolitanism versus nativism, and the particular literature is Hispanic-American literature. Explaining those tendencies and how writers experience them is the work done throughout.
- C
Outstanding works and favorable reviews are mentioned, but to illustrate the competing influences. The discussion isn't a summary of the culture's literary accomplishments.
- D
Cultural identity could matter to politics, but this discussion concerns literary forms, voices, and influences. It isn't setting up a political debate.
- E
What prevailing assumption is being refuted? We aren't given a widely held belief that the writer sets out to disprove. Explaining the historical pattern of a tension isn't the same as refuting an accepted account of it.
More Purpose of Claim questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Purpose of Claim questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.