- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 120
- Section 2, Question 26
Until recently, biologists were unable to explain the(439 more words not shown)
The primary purpose of the(3 more words not shown)
- Acompare examples challenging(10 more words not shown)
- Bargue that the(14 more words not shown)
- Coffer a modification(7 more words not shown)
- Dattack evidence that(7 more words not shown)
- Eexamine the origins(7 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
Our main-point prediction explains how a pathogen can succeed even while severely harming its host. For purpose, ask what that explanation does to the prevailing view: it adds a way of achieving success that benign coexistence doesn't account for.
Working the answers
- A
Examples do appear, but comparing examples on opposing sides isn't the overall purpose. They develop and qualify the new explanation about transmission and virulence.
- B
The writer doesn't preserve the prevailing conclusion while merely replacing its reason. The modification allows success through harmful relationships as well as benign ones.
- CCorrect
Keeping the host well is one possible route to survival; sufficient transmission to new hosts is another. The discussion modifies the prevailing view to accommodate pathogens that incapacitate or kill their hosts.
- D
No particular body of evidence for the prevailing view is attacked. The writer presents an additional explanation and illustrates its implications.
- E
The opening states the prevailing view and its rationale, but doesn't trace its historical origins. The focus is how the new explanation changes our understanding.
More Organization questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Organization questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.