- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 117
- Section 1, Question 27
The proponents of the Modern Movement in architecture(451 more words not shown)
The author of the passage(4 more words not shown)
- Aanalyzing the failure(3 more words not shown)
- Bpredicting the future(4 more words not shown)
- Ccorrecting a misunderstanding(3 more words not shown)
- Danticipating possible criticism(3 more words not shown)
- Econtrasting incompatible viewpoints(3 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
Our main-point prediction was an explanation of decline: the movement's rigid ideals conflicted with practical construction. The purpose should describe that work of explaining why the movement faltered.
Working the answers
- ACorrect
The account connects the decline to inflexible ideology, construction difficulties, and the costs of exposed structural materials. That's an analysis of the movement's failure to adapt, not a claim that it never achieved professional success.
- B
This looks backward at a decline and its causes. It doesn't forecast the movement's future course.
- C
The opening challenges the proponents' claim to fit modern methods, but the whole discussion isn't organized around correcting a particular misunderstanding. It explains the movement's decline.
- D
The writer presents criticisms as reasons for that decline. We aren't anticipating objections in order to defend the movement against them.
- E
Proponents' claims and the Postmodern observation differ, but the central job isn't comparing incompatible viewpoints. Those views contribute to the explanation of what went wrong.
More Main Point questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Main Point questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.