PrepTest 117, Section 1, Question 13

DetailDifficulty2 of 5
Passage 2Chinese settlers and nontraditional evidence in Pacific Coast history
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 117

In the field of historiography—the writing of history(454 more words not shown)

Which one of the following(8 more words not shown)

Reading the passage

This is an open inference question. We know what the settlers contributed and why their actions matter as evidence. We aren't given every detail about why they immigrated or what happened to every document they left, so those claims would need their own support.

Working the answers

  • A

    We aren't told why most Chinese settlers immigrated. Knowing that they found agricultural opportunities after arriving doesn't establish that a familiar climate brought them there.

  • B
    Correct

    The final paragraph identifies their expertise in reclaiming swamps and managing irrigation (paragraph 4). Those nineteenth-century settlers were applying that knowledge to agriculture. B follows directly from the skills described.

  • C

    This switches the groups. The Chinese settlers saw spice potential in wild mustard; the other settlers generally saw a nuisance.

  • D

    Having written records doesn't establish that examining actions is worthless. The writer's argument favors a broader record of experience and never exempts European settlers from it.

  • E

    A shortage of written records isn't evidence that existing documents were neglected and lost. The stated explanation is that most Asian settlers didn't focus on creating systematic written accounts.

More Detail questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Detail questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.