- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 117
- Section 1, Passage 3
The full passage is in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 117.
Reading the passage
What tells a nerve cell to grow or stay alive? The opening introduces chemicals called neurotrophic factors that regulate nerve-cell survival and some specialized functions. Animals, including humans, produce these chemicals. One of them is NGF, discovered by Rita Levi-Montalcini in the 1950s. The writer immediately calls that discovery crucial, so we should expect to learn both what she found and why it mattered.
The Nobel Prize came decades later. I might wonder why recognition took so long or why the prize was shared, but no explanation is given. Those are questions raised by the background, not the direction the account actually takes.
Instead, we go back to her original hypothesis: many immature nerve cells are normally programmed to die. That initially sounds odd. Why produce cells an organism won't keep? Her research found that embryos make more nerve cells than they ultimately need, with the surviving number adjusting to the amount of tissue that needs a nerve supply. The developing system doesn't simply keep every cell it starts with.
The next stage begins with a striking observation. Implanting a certain mouse tumor into a chick embryo stimulates nerve development. I wouldn't have thought to put those things together, but the important question is what produces the effect. Levi-Montalcini proposes that a chemical from the tumor causes the growth. The tumor's presence is the observation; a chemical released by it is the proposed explanation.
How can she investigate that? Tissue culture lets researchers grow particular body cells outside the organism. She uses chick-embryo extracts and adds mouse tumor tissue. Within twenty-four hours, dense halos of nerve tissue form near the added tumor. That gives her a way to observe the growth outside the embryo itself. Further research identifies the responsible protein, which she names nerve growth factor.
Keep the sequence straight: observation, proposed chemical explanation, investigation, then identification of NGF. Using tissue culture doesn't mean she invented the technique, and adding tumor tissue isn't the same as already having an isolated sample of NGF before the investigation.
The final paragraph asks what we've learned about the substance. NGF was the first of many cell-growth factors discovered, so it isn't the only chemical of this kind. It appears in many tissues and fluids, with higher concentrations in some organs. The account doesn't tell us to assume that whichever organ has the highest concentration must be where it is manufactured.
The local relationship is especially useful to picture. A developing nerve cell receives NGF from the muscle or other organ cells it will connect with, or sometimes from nearby supporting cells. This isn't an unrelated chemical arriving from nowhere. It comes from cells in the developing nerve's surroundings.
NGF then has two described jobs. First, it guides developing nerve processes toward the right target cells. Later, it helps keep those nerve cells alive. During certain periods of development, the affected cell types die without NGF or when they encounter anti-NGF antibodies. The qualifiers matter: we aren't told every nerve cell depends on NGF in the same way throughout an organism's entire life.
So my main-point prediction is that discovering NGF was an important advance in biochemistry because it helped explain nerve development and survival. The experiments show how the substance was identified; the final paragraph develops what it tells us. We should keep both parts, rather than make the whole account about chick embryos or a laboratory technique.
Levi-Montalcini’s discovery of NGF advanced biochemistry by helping explain how a chemical guides the development and supports the survival of certain nerve cells.
Questions on this passage
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Reading Comprehension questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.