- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 157
- Section 1, Question 24
Some environmentalists claim that the higher the international(435 more words not shown)
Which one of the following(23 more words not shown)
- Areintroducing traditional farming(1 more words not shown)
- Bopening up land(3 more words not shown)
- Ccurtailing road(1 more words not shown)
- Ddecreasing spending on(1 more words not shown)
- Eraising prices on(1 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
Avert a negative impact means avoid a harm. So we're looking for one of the author's examples of a spending reduction that stops something environmentally damaging. The second paragraph names canceled dams or roads and eliminated fertilizer or pesticide subsidies.
Working the answers
- A
Traditional farming methods aren't proposed. Don't supply an environmentally appealing policy that the author never mentions.
- B
Clearing land for cash crops is one of the environmentalists' examples of damage. It doesn't answer a question asking how a response to debt could avert damage.
- CCorrect
The author explicitly says countries might cancel proposed dam or road construction (paragraph 2). Curtailing road construction matches that example: debt pressure could cause a country to stop a project that would otherwise harm the environment.
- D
Sanitation appears among the beneficial services that could lose funding. Cutting it is offered as a possible cost of debt repayment, not an avoided environmental harm.
- E
Raising export prices isn't identified as an environmental benefit of debt pressure. The export discussion concerns shifting production toward goods sold abroad, not changing their prices.
More Detail questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Detail questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.