- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 141
- Section 3, Question 24
It is generally believed that while in some(434 more words not shown)
It can be inferred from(18 more words not shown)
- APeople should generally(21 more words not shown)
- BThe fact that(27 more words not shown)
- CBoth the probability(26 more words not shown)
- DFor public-policy purposes,(21 more words not shown)
- EThe main category(14 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
The opening gives us a useful contrast: experts tend to focus on lives at stake; laypeople focus more on whether someone chose the risk. Apply that to flying. A passenger's earlier choice to board does not become the central policy issue for experts merely because a later crash occurred.
Working the answers
- A
The discussion concerns when government should spend resources, not whether skydivers should receive any protection at all. They might take precautions themselves or receive protection from a company. The author does not establish this broad no-protection rule.
- BCorrect
Since experts emphasize aggregate lives at stake, whether crash victims chose to fly would usually carry little weight in deciding the government's air-safety role. This applies the stated expert emphasis without claiming that experts never consider any other factor.
- C
No probabilities are compared. We cannot rank crashes against every other danger airline passengers face from the fact that crashes are used as an example.
- D
The author stresses degrees of choice and the inadequacy of simple labels for policy. A rule that classifies every choice-dependent risk as voluntary does not follow from that discussion or solve the author's concern.
- E
The asteroid example shows a case that can lack voluntariness. It does not establish that natural disasters are the main category of completely involuntary risk.
More Author's Opinion questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Author's Opinion questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.