- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 134
- Section 4, Question 26
During Dostoyevsky's time there were two significant and(437 more words not shown)
Given the information in the(20 more words not shown)
- AOnly works of(11 more words not shown)
- BOnly works of(14 more words not shown)
- CWorks of literature(13 more words not shown)
- DA work of(11 more words not shown)
- EA work of(11 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
This is broad: what claim about literature can we support from Dostoyevsky's views? We know he values artistic merit, rejects a compulsory political purpose, and doubts that usefulness is easy to measure. I don't have a single exact prediction; each answer needs to fit what he actually says.
Working the answers
- ACorrect
Paragraph 3 says that a work must achieve artistic success to accomplish its aims. He then explains artistry in terms of writing well. So if a work is to fulfill a political goal, it must first succeed as writing. That's a requirement for achieving such a goal, not a requirement that every work have one.
- B
This reverses the relationship. A political goal doesn't have to be present for a work to be well written. Dostoyevsky expressly rejects making that purpose compulsory.
- C
Nothing says all poorly written works attempt to serve politics. A work could simply be poorly written without any such ambition.
- D
He doesn't forbid well-written literature from serving a political view. Rejecting a compulsory purpose isn't the same as banning that purpose.
- E
Political purpose and good writing can coexist. His point is that the purpose doesn't replace the need for artistic quality.
More Application questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Application questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.