- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 134
- Section 4, Question 6
Determining the most effective way to deter deliberate(447 more words not shown)
The passage suggests that the(13 more words not shown)
- AThe rate at(20 more words not shown)
- BThe rate at(17 more words not shown)
- CThe rate of(14 more words not shown)
- DThe rate of(15 more words not shown)
- EThe rate of(13 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
This is an EXCEPT question: four policies or predictions should fit the author's account, and one should not. Keep both sides of the comparison in view. A person weighs the expected utility of crime against the expected utility of lawful activity.
Working the answers
- A
Stronger penalties make another offense more costly if detected. That lowers crime's expected utility and fits the prediction of less repeat offending.
- B
Rehabilitation is one of the endorsed deterrence measures. Removing it can undo its contribution to making lawful activity the more attractive choice, so this prediction fits the account.
- CCorrect
This goes in the wrong direction. If lawful activity becomes less rewarding, crime becomes relatively more attractive, all else equal. The model therefore gives us a reason to expect more deliberate crime, not less. Lawful activity isn't outside the calculation; it is the alternative against which crime is compared.
- D
Less economic access can reduce the attractiveness of lawful opportunities. That fits an increased incentive to turn to crime.
- E
Inversely means moving in opposite directions. Stronger enforcement increases the risk of detection, reducing crime's appeal; weaker enforcement does the reverse. That is the relationship the author describes.
More Author's Opinion questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Author's Opinion questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.