PrepTest 123, Section 1, Question 21

Main PointDifficulty4 of 5
Passage 4Criticisms of Victorian philanthropy
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 123

Although philanthropy—the volunteering of private resources for humanitarian(426 more words not shown)

Which one of the following(8 more words not shown)

Reading the passage

We've already predicted the main point: the criticisms of Victorian philanthropy go too far. We're looking for some version of that idea, even if the answer uses more abstract language.

What we’re looking for

Keep the response concrete. The writer challenges the assumption that later state-managed charity makes Victorian philanthropy inferior, then reminds us that the philanthropists understood potential problems with state charity and contributed real resources. This is a defense against an unfair historical interpretation, not proof that the donors were perfect.

Working the answers

  • A

    The discussion does report criticism of the donors' motives. But “successfully dealt with the social ills” turns a defense against unfair criticism into a claim that philanthropy solved England's social problems. Donating money, careers, and lives doesn't establish that larger claim, so this overstates the main idea.

  • B

    The contrast between private and state-sponsored charity matters, but this turns the discussion into a history of one replacing the other. The central task is to assess whether the modern criticisms give a fair picture of Victorian philanthropy. This misses that response.

  • C

    The Whig fallacy is important, but the claim about revisionist views of “many institutions” isn't supported. We examine this bias to reassess Victorian philanthropy, not to make a historical claim about a range of institutions.

  • D
    Correct

    The first two paragraphs give the criticisms—inadequacy and self-interest—and the last two challenge their historical assumptions. The writer calls the resulting picture patronizing and points to what it overlooks. That matches a theoretical bias producing an incorrect interpretation of history.

  • E

    No devious methods for concealing motives are described. The ending acknowledges possible condescension while crediting actual contributions, rather than exposing a scheme to hide self-interest.

More Main Point questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Main Point questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.