- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 112
- Section 2, Question 24
With the elimination of the apartheid system, South(478 more words not shown)
According to the passage, under(11 more words not shown)
- Adecisions rendered in(2 more words not shown)
- Bchallenges from concerned(1 more words not shown)
- Cnew laws passed(3 more words not shown)
- Dprovisions in the(4 more words not shown)
- Eother judges with(7 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
Parliament passed new laws. That was how it could undo a ruling it disliked, and it's why we identified parliament as the old system's final legal authority. Let's match that detail.
Working the answers
- A
The constitutional court belongs to the new arrangement, not the old mechanism described here.
- B
The relevant sentence names parliament, not concerned citizens, as the actor counteracting the judges.
- CCorrect
Paragraph one says that when parliament disagreed with judges, it enacted legislation that reversed the effect of those decisions. That directly answers the question.
- D
The bill of rights is part of the new system. It wasn't the old parliament's means of counteracting rulings.
- E
We aren't told that other judges did this. Parliament passed the new laws.
More Detail questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Detail questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.