- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 110
- Section 1, Question 25
When women are persecuted on account of their(438 more words not shown)
The passage suggests that which(23 more words not shown)
- AThe terms and(22 more words not shown)
- BMany of the(24 more words not shown)
- CA new interpretation(29 more words not shown)
- DA change in(28 more words not shown)
- EThe terms and(22 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
UNHCR's position is likely to affect how national asylum laws are interpreted. Why? Many national laws use terms developed under the international consensus UNHCR represents. A new interpretation at that international level can therefore influence the same language in national law.
Working the answers
- A
We aren't given a comparison saying the UN documents are interpreted more narrowly. Influence doesn't tell us which set of terms receives the narrower reading.
- B
This gives us a national-first history: national terms were compiled into the UN documents. The text instead explains national terms through an international consensus. It doesn't supply the history B needs.
- CCorrect
A new interpretation in a UN document is likely to influence the interpretation of a similar national-law term. That closely matches the final paragraph’s prediction that domestic asylum laws will likely be read in light of the UNHCR position (paragraph 4).
- D
Likely influence is not a requirement that every wording change must appear in national law. This strengthens the relationship into a binding rule and shifts from interpretation to mandatory wording changes.
- E
Nothing says the national and international terms directly oppose each other. The writer explains a connection through shared international consensus, not a conflict between their definitions.
More Reading Comprehension questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.