- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 142
- Section 3, Question 21
Passage A  To a neuroscientist, you are your(463 more words not shown)
Passage A(205 more words not shown)
Passage B(266 more words not shown)
Which one of the following(11 more words not shown)
- AMany word processors(26 more words not shown)
- BEconomic models generally(35 more words not shown)
- CThe existing program(26 more words not shown)
- DCivil disobedience is(34 more words not shown)
- EBeing autonomous does(28 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
Strip away the topic. A says an established practice rests on a mistaken understanding of human action: retribution depends on freely chosen wrongdoing, but neuroscience challenges that assumption. The author then recommends changing the practice and its justification.
What we’re looking for
We want the same move from a faulty underlying assumption to replacing an existing approach. An answer can mention minds or control and still have a different argument.
Working the answers
- A
This identifies unnecessary features as a practical obstacle and recommends fewer of them. It does not challenge an underlying belief on which an established practice is based. Passage A revises a justification for punishment, not simply a design with distracting extras.
- B
This is tempting because evidence challenges a model's assumption of rational behavior. But the conclusion concerns the model's expected predictive ability, rather than recommending replacement of a practice based on the mistaken assumption. The issue is the kind of conclusion, not merely the phrase in theory.
- CCorrect
The teaching program rests on mistaken beliefs about what children can understand, so it should be replaced. The mistaken view of children's capacities matches the challenged view of free moral choice; replacing the program matches revising the retributive approach to punishment.
- D
This applies an accepted requirement for justified civil disobedience. It does not argue that the requirement itself rests on a mistaken premise and should be replaced. The direction of the reasoning is different.
- E
This uses addicted smokers to distinguish autonomy from full behavioral control. Those subjects sound similar to A's, but the argument does not move from a defective assumption underlying a practice to a recommendation to change that practice.
More Analogy questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Analogy questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.