PrepTest 132, Section 3, Question 10

Purpose of ClaimDifficulty4 of 5
Passage 2Competing explanations of the late heavy bombardment
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 132

A vigorous debate in astronomy centers on an(463 more words not shown)

The author mentions that the(14 more words not shown)

Reading the passage

Why mention Earth while introducing a debate based on Moon rocks? Read through the rest of the sentence: life could not have survived here until the bombardment ended. That gives the astronomical question consequences for our own planet.

Working the answers

  • A

    The statement introduces the issue's significance before the competing theories are laid out. It isn't offered as evidence favoring one of those theories over the others.

  • B

    The author isn't asking why evidence is missing from Earth. The point is what bombardment here would have meant for life.

  • C

    No scientific model of how life originated is advocated. A limit on when life could survive is not an explanation of how it began.

  • D
    Correct

    The link to life's history explains why scientists care about the LHB. Its consequences extend beyond the craters that first brought it to their attention.

  • E

    The statement concerns where the bombardment should have struck and why that matters. It adds no evidence for the four-billion-year date.

More Purpose of Claim questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Purpose of Claim questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.