PrepTest 132, Section 3, Question 23

Main PointDifficulty1 of 5
Passage 4Interpretation and the limits of automated legal reasoning
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 132

Computers have long been utilized in the sphere(437 more words not shown)

In the passage as a(7 more words not shown)

Reading the passage

Our main-point prediction also gives us the author's purpose. The author examines why automated legal reasoning hasn't delivered what was hoped for. I want an answer focused on the interpretive difficulties, not one celebrating the technology's future.

Working the answers

  • A

    This promises fundamental change. The author's emphasis is on the barriers that have prevented the described systems from succeeding.

  • B
    Correct

    The mobile-home and marriage examples illustrate subtle questions of interpretation, while the last paragraph shows the difficulty of identifying relevant precedents. These are aspects of legal reasoning that the programs don't readily handle.

  • C

    The case-based approach is introduced as a proposed improvement, then criticized. The author isn't demonstrating that the programs are nearing success at applying precedents.

  • D

    The author doesn't argue from the human origin of law to a requirement that programmers use human intuition. Explaining what the programs lack is different from prescribing that particular way of designing them.

  • E

    Established computer uses supply the opening background. Defending computers as indispensable to the profession isn't the purpose of the discussion that follows.

More Main Point questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Main Point questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.