- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 126
- Section 2, Question 22
In economics, the term "speculative bubble" refers to(462 more words not shown)
Which one of the following(9 more words not shown)
- AThe seventeenth-century Dutch(17 more words not shown)
- BMackay did not(16 more words not shown)
- CA speculative bubble(16 more words not shown)
- DGarber argues that(19 more words not shown)
- EA tulip bulb(17 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
We've already predicted Garber's challenge to Mackay's view that this was a speculative bubble. Garber offers an explanation based on earnings from descendant bulbs. The answer should report that central challenge without turning it into a conclusion the writer explicitly endorses.
Working the answers
- A
This declares the usual classification mistaken. The writer tells us that Garber challenges it, not that his challenge has settled the dispute.
- B
This narrows the discussion to a defect in Mackay's assessment of earnings. Earnings matter because they support Garber's larger argument about whether the market was a speculative bubble. B never reaches that conclusion.
- C
This isn't even the complete definition. A sharp rise and fall aren't enough: the opening also specifies prices driven by “mere speculation” about resale rather than fundamentals. That distinction is exactly why Garber disputes the tulip example. C also leaves out the dispute itself.
- DCorrect
This identifies who is challenging whom and what the challenge concerns. It reports Garber's position without claiming that the writer has established its truth.
- E
This is a reason Garber gives for his conclusion. Being able to earn a return despite falling prices helps explain why the tulip market needn't have been a speculative bubble. The supporting point alone leaves out the larger argument.
More Main Point questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Main Point questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.