PrepTest 123, Section 4, Question 8

OrganizationDifficulty2 of 5
Passage 1Rita Dove and the weakening divide between poetry and fiction
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 123

For decades, there has been a deep rift(452 more words not shown)

If this passage had been(27 more words not shown)

Reading the passage

If the writer continued, where would the discussion naturally go? Back to the main trend: the bias against crossing genre boundaries is diminishing, several writers are respected for both kinds of work, and Dove shows what that crossing can look like.

What we’re looking for

I would expect that movement to continue, with more writers working in both poetry and fiction. That's a modest extension of what we have read, not a prediction that the two genres or all specialization will disappear.

Working the answers

  • A
    Correct

    More writers working in both genres would continue the change already described. It keeps the focus on writers crossing the boundary without claiming that everyone will do so.

  • B

    We haven't been given a market forecast for pure lyric poetry. A change in what writers produce doesn't establish that readers will buy less of another kind of writing.

  • C

    The description of blended elements doesn't propose a new classification of narrative poetry as a type of fiction. The writer continues to refer to Dove's poems as poetry.

  • D

    Increased specialization points in the opposite direction from the movement away from rigid separation emphasized here.

  • E

    More writers doing both doesn't mean specialists will lose their audiences. Readers might still enjoy work by poets or fiction writers who stay within one genre; no audience shift is established.

More Organization questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Organization questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.