PrepTest 122 · Section 3 · Passage 4

How C-4 photosynthesis makes maize productive

The full passage is in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 122.

Reading the passage

Corn changed whole cultures. That's a large claim, and the first paragraph gives us examples: Native Americans adopted farming and sometimes urban lifestyles, while maize and potatoes helped European populations grow. The connection is food. A crop that produces much more food from the same amount of land can support changes in how people live.

But why does corn produce so much? That question moves us from the crop's effects on society to the mechanism behind its productivity. The cultural examples give us a reason to care; now we need the explanation.

The next paragraph starts with plants generally. They split water into hydrogen and oxygen, use the hydrogen in producing what they need for energy, and release oxygen. They also take in carbon dioxide to build sugars. Rubisco is an enzyme that helps with that sugar-making reaction.

So far, this doesn't tell us what makes corn different. We're learning the ordinary process so we can understand its problem. We don't need to memorize every name. Keep track of the jobs: water supplies hydrogen, carbon dioxide supplies material for sugars, and rubisco helps make those sugars.

Then comes the problem. When oxygen becomes sufficiently concentrated relative to carbon dioxide, it competes to bind with rubisco and interferes with photosynthesis. That's the obstacle. Does corn have a way to keep oxygen from disrupting the enzyme?

The third paragraph answers that question with separation. Some plants keep the water-splitting process apart from the sugar-making process. Rubisco sits inside protected tissues called bundle sheath cells, away from the oxygen being produced elsewhere. The advantage isn't simply having rubisco. It's keeping the enzyme where oxygen cannot interfere with its work.

Be precise about where that protection operates. The gases are excluded from the cells containing rubisco, not from the entire leaf. The bundle sheath cells surround the leaf's vascular structures; they aren't the same thing as those structures. You can think of the vascular structures as the leaf's transport system, using the comparison to blood vessels.

There's a complication, though. Keeping all atmospheric gases out also blocks carbon dioxide, which the plant still needs for making sugars. How can the material get in without admitting the gas directly?

It travels in another form. Reactions first convert the carbon dioxide into a nongas intermediary called C-4. That molecule enters the protected cells, where further reactions release carbon dioxide for sugar production. The plant keeps the protective barrier while still delivering what the reaction needs. Four refers to the carbon atoms in this intermediary, not in rubisco.

That's the whole connection: separate the processes, protect rubisco, and get carbon dioxide into the protected area through the intermediary. The final sentence links this C-4 process to highly productive crops, including maize.

Our main-point prediction can now answer the question from the first paragraph. Corn is so productive because its photosynthetic process protects sugar production from oxygen's interference. We don't need the entire sequence of chemical reactions in our one-sentence prediction, but we do need that explanation. Simply saying corn changed cultures would stop before the central question gets answered.

Questions on this passage

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Reading Comprehension questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.