- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 116
- Section 4, Question 20
Most scientists who study the physiological effects of(447 more words not shown)
Which one of the following(10 more words not shown)
- ABecause of their(27 more words not shown)
- BA new study(26 more words not shown)
- CResearchers have found(20 more words not shown)
- DAlthough it has(19 more words not shown)
- EWine, unlike other(22 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
We've already predicted apparent benefits from wine that may come from grape compounds. The grape-juice result helps connect those two ideas: a similar effect appears without wine's alcohol.
What we’re looking for
For the main point, keep both the possible benefits and their proposed source. The author offers a developing explanation, not conclusive proof.
Working the answers
- A
The opening criticizes research that overlooked wine's distinctive effects. A extends the point to alcoholic beverages generally and stops before the research and grape-compound explanation.
- B
We're told there are several contributing factors, but not that scientists believed lipids were the sole cause of heart disease. Correcting that supposed belief isn't the argument's focus.
- C
Slower absorption is one finding, not the central explanation. The stated comparison is also with distilled spirits, rather than every other alcoholic beverage.
- D
The evidence isn't presented as definitive, but this makes the limitation the whole point. The author is developing a positive explanation of apparent benefits, not merely announcing that they remain unproved.
- ECorrect
This matches our prediction: apparent beneficial effects that may be tied to particular substances naturally present in grapes (paragraph 3). The final grape-juice study supports that proposed source. Appears and may preserve the author's caution.
More Main Point questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Main Point questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.