- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 113
- Section 1, Question 1
The jury trial is one of the handful(440 more words not shown)
Which one of the following(9 more words not shown)
- ABecause trials requiring(16 more words not shown)
- BThe unanimity requirement(20 more words not shown)
- CThe problem of(23 more words not shown)
- DThe unanimity requirement(20 more words not shown)
- EBecause its material(20 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
We've already predicted the main point: keep unanimity. The writer thinks its protection for fair verdicts is worth the costs of occasional deadlocks. We want that recommendation, with the reasons supporting it, rather than just a fact about hung juries.
Working the answers
- A
Saying the requirement should survive examination isn't saying it shouldn't be examined. The writer has just weighed its costs and benefits. This replaces the conclusion of that examination with a refusal to undertake it.
- B
Keep unanimity is right; irresponsible jurors is wrong. The writer says deadlocks can suggest that jurors are conscientiously doing their jobs. B reverses that defense of the holdout.
- C
This is a supporting point: close evidence can explain deadlock without making it a failure of the system. But the larger purpose is to defend keeping unanimity. C stops before that recommendation.
- D
The recommendation fits, but the added condition doesn't capture the argument. The writer treats deadlock as evidence of conscientious work, not as grounds for an endorsement conditional on jurors behaving conscientiously. The central tradeoff is costs versus fairness.
- ECorrect
Paragraph 2 says the expense of jury deadlock does not justify sacrificing the social value of unanimity. Paragraph 3 develops the fairness benefit. E puts those together: the benefit outweighs the cost, so the requirement should remain.
More Main Point questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Main Point questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.