PrepTest 104, Section 2, Question 21

DetailDifficulty4 of 5
Passage 3Bird plumage and status signaling
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 104

Many birds that form flocks compete through aggressive(453 more words not shown)

Which one of the following(9 more words not shown)

Reading the passage

We know the Harris sparrow findings don't establish individual-status signaling within an age class. We also know they aren't useless: adults usually have darker throats and higher status than juveniles. For this inference question, we'll need to check what follows from those findings and the earlier explanation of how flock status works.

Working the answers

  • A

    This reverses the distinction. Plumage indicates broad age-related differences; the writer says it does not signal individual status within an age class.

  • B
    Correct

    Join two statements: adults have higher status than juveniles, and higher status gives priority of access to resources such as food. Adults therefore have priority over juveniles when it comes to food. The answer isn't stated in one sentence, but both pieces are supplied.

  • C

    We never compare these two groups' status. Dyeing juveniles to resemble adults makes them dominant over undyed juveniles; it doesn't establish equality with light-plumaged adults.

  • D

    We don't learn whether juveniles fight more frequently than adults. Higher or lower status doesn't tell us how often each group fights.

  • E

    Nothing compares how frequently sparrows and titmice fight. The studies compare the evidence for signaling, not the species' rates of aggression.

More Detail questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Detail questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.