- Home
- LSAT explanations
- Drill sets
- Question 1
For centuries trial by jury has been a(452 more words not shown)
Which one of the following(9 more words not shown)
- AThe Canadian and(22 more words not shown)
- BDue to structural(19 more words not shown)
- CThe military's argument(20 more words not shown)
- DThe rights of(26 more words not shown)
- ELarge jury size(18 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
We already predicted the main point: reform military trials so defendants get protections closer to those in civilian trials. We are looking for a version of that recommendation. The jury sizes, voting rules, and studies explain why the change is needed.
Working the answers
- A
The court decisions help the author argue for reform. We are not told that pressure from those decisions is forcing the military to change.
- B
“Far more” innocent people being convicted would require a comparison of wrongful-conviction rates. We have concerns about safeguards, not those numbers.
- C
The author does answer an efficiency objection near the end. But that rebuttal supports the reform recommendation; it does not capture the whole argument about protecting defendants.
- DCorrect
The ending says military systems “should be reformed” to “more closely resemble” civilian systems. This answer combines that recommendation with its reason: civilian procedures give defendants greater protection. That is the point we predicted.
- E
Larger juries and unanimity are reasons to favor reform. The author goes further than saying those safeguards help: military trials should adopt protections closer to the civilian ones. This gives supporting reasoning while leaving out the recommendation.
More Main Point questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Main Point questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.