- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 118
- Section 2, Question 27
The following passage was written in the late(473 more words not shown)
The passage as a whole(6 more words not shown)
- Aan argument stressing(11 more words not shown)
- Ba comprehensive study(9 more words not shown)
- Can examination of(8 more words not shown)
- Dan argument favoring(9 more words not shown)
- Ean attempt to(8 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
Our revised main point concerns the difficulty of applying constitutional protection. We've examined two problems: establishing that customs qualify, then determining what recognized ownership allows. I would describe the overall work as an examination of those problems, with criticism of one court's solution.
Working the answers
- A
The final hope for an appeal isn't a general strategy program for rights advocates. The discussion mainly explains the difficulties courts and claimants face.
- B
Comprehensive is too broad for this focused account of interpretive problems and two examples. It doesn't survey the full range of efforts to secure these rights.
- CCorrect
The constitutional reforms aim to protect rights, and the account examines the problems that arise in implementing that protection. Both the documentation issue and the ownership dispute fit.
- D
The writer favors a broader application in the land case, but the whole discussion isn't an argument for revising definitions. It examines the difficulties of interpreting and applying the protection already adopted.
- E
We aren't given a prevalent misunderstanding that the writer sets out to correct. The organization follows practical legal problems and an unsatisfactory ruling, not a mistaken belief followed by its correction.
More Organization questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Organization questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.