PrepTest 116, Section 1, Question 3

Author's OpinionDifficulty1 of 5
Passage 1Oil drilling, groundwater contamination, and the limits of hindsight-based regulation
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 116

The accumulation of scientific knowledge regarding the environmental(459 more words not shown)

The author's attitude regarding oil(9 more words not shown)

Reading the passage

The main point gives us the direction: the writer is concerned that the rules lag behind the problems. We keep discovering hazards after damage has occurred, and the existing barriers still have unassessed risks. That doesn't sound like satisfaction or confidence that everything will work out.

Working the answers

  • A

    International concern did follow the coastal disaster. But the writer doesn't say future reform depends on international attention. The recurring concern is reform following damage.

  • B

    Existing regulations still leave risks because the relevant science is incomplete. Calling them adequate reverses that concern.

  • C
    Correct

    The opening says the need for regulation becomes apparent “only after undesirable events occur.” The final disaster repeats that pattern: contamination first, efforts to refine the rules afterward.

  • D

    Scientific research is relevant, but no confidence in current research producing reform is expressed. The emphasis is on unanswered questions.

  • E

    Identifying a lack of geological understanding doesn't establish confidence that future regulations will overcome it. That hopeful forecast isn't given.

More Author's Opinion questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Author's Opinion questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.