- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 115
- Section 3, Question 2
The contemporary Mexican artistic movement known as muralism,(459 more words not shown)
The author mentions Rivera's use(23 more words not shown)
- Aassimilation of elements(5 more words not shown)
- Bmovement beyond single,(2 more words not shown)
- Cexperimentation with expressionist(1 more words not shown)
- Ddistinctive manner of(2 more words not shown)
- Eunderlying resistance to(1 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
My first prediction is artistic innovation: this is an example of what Rivera did. The sentence immediately before it makes the job more precise. Although the artists shared an interest in Mexican identity, each developed a different artistic approach (paragraph 3). Rivera is the first example of that difference.
Working the answers
- A
Mexican customs and myths appear earlier, but this sentence isn't listing those subjects in Rivera's paintings. It describes artistic influences, including Italian Renaissance frescoes, that help explain his particular style.
- B
Moving beyond a single centered subject belongs to the later discussion of the mural medium. It isn't what these two influences illustrate here.
- C
The next artist, Orozco, receives the more expressionist description. We shouldn't transfer that description to Rivera just because the artists appear in the same paragraph.
- DCorrect
Rivera combines these influences with mechanical shapes for people. Then Orozco and Siqueiros receive different descriptions. That sequence supports the preceding point about each artist developing a distinctive way of working.
- E
Incorporating influences into a distinctive style doesn't illustrate resistance to change. Nothing in the example says Rivera opposed change.
More Detail questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Detail questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.