PrepTest 111, Section 2, Question 20

Author's OpinionDifficulty3 of 5
Passage 3Universal laws and historical contingency in evolutionary biology
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 111

Philosophers of science have long been uneasy with(447 more words not shown)

The passage suggests that the(15 more words not shown)

Reading the passage

Back to the philosophers: why do they prefer physics? The opening points to their mistrust of uncertainty. Physics offers the kind of repeatable, universal relationships they think science should study. That's the preference we need to explain.

Working the answers

  • A

    This is the tempting one because it mentions laws. But difficulty discovering a law is different from whether universal laws necessarily explain the outcomes at all. The discussion raises the second issue; it doesn't say the philosophers choose physics because its laws are easier to find.

  • B

    Popular attention to discoveries isn't discussed.

  • C

    We aren't told about scientific institutions' research priorities. Their bias isn't the explanation given for the philosophers' preference.

  • D

    Their teaching experiences are never described.

  • E
    Correct

    The nature of the phenomena means the kind of things physics studies. The falling animals and planetary orbits illustrate repeatable relationships governed by universal laws. That is what these philosophers find appealing. E expresses our prediction about certainty through the phenomena that are supposed to provide it.

More Author's Opinion questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Author's Opinion questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.