- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 104
- Section 3, Question 23
Freud's essay on "The Uncanny" can be said(458 more words not shown)
According to the passage, Bettelheim(15 more words not shown)
- Amost troubled children(4 more words not shown)
- Bmost children believe(5 more words not shown)
- Cthe parents' telling(12 more words not shown)
- Dthe parents can(11 more words not shown)
- Ethe parents can(8 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
A parent choosing to tell the story communicates approval of it. That's Bettelheim's stated reason the telling strengthens its effect. We don't need a new theory about why reading with a parent might help.
Working the answers
- A
We aren't told that most troubled children can't or don't read independently. The explanation concerns approval, not access to the story.
- B
Approval of a story doesn't establish that children believe everything their parents say. That broader claim isn't supplied.
- CCorrect
“Sanction” here means approval. Paragraph 4 says parents communicate their endorsement of the tales to their child. This restates that reason.
- D
Choosing to tell a story isn't the same as directing the child's interpretation to match the parent's beliefs. Bettelheim gives the child an active role in finding meaning.
- E
We aren't told parents strengthen the effect by reassuring children that the events aren't real. Their approval of the tale is the relevant message.
More Detail questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Detail questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.