- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 124
- Section 4, Question 20
Sometimes there is no more effective means of(444 more words not shown)
Which one of the following(9 more words not shown)
- AControl of agricultural(23 more words not shown)
- BExperimental verification is(11 more words not shown)
- CThe relationship between(17 more words not shown)
- DPredation by Typhlodromus(12 more words not shown)
- ESimilarity in mode(20 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
We've already predicted Typhlodromus as an example of effective pest control through predation. I also included the contrast with a pesticide that removes the predator. Now we need the central idea, without turning this example into a rule for every pest.
Working the answers
- A
The opening says “Sometimes.” This answer makes a broad claim about the most effective and safest way to control agricultural pests. One case in which a pesticide makes things worse doesn't establish that general ranking.
- B
The experiments support the biological example. The main point isn't that experimental verification is essential, and the writer doesn't make that requirement.
- CCorrect
This connects the two mites to the broader point: natural predation can control agricultural pests. It doesn't mention the pesticide explicitly, but it captures what the example demonstrates.
- D
The specific mite names and strawberry fields make this sound close. But “essential” says control requires Typhlodromus; we haven't ruled out every other predator or possible method. It also leaves out the role of this relationship as an example of a broader phenomenon. More specific isn't automatically more accurate.
- E
Reproduction helps explain the predator's effectiveness, but this elevates part of the second paragraph into the whole point. It leaves out the broader pest-control lesson and other helpful features, such as surviving when prey is scarce.
More Main Point questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Main Point questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.