- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 106
- Section 4, Question 1
Some Native American tribes have had difficulty establishing(436 more words not shown)
Which one of the following(11 more words not shown)
- ALand claim suits(22 more words not shown)
- BLand claim suits(16 more words not shown)
- CLand claim suits(21 more words not shown)
- DLand claim suits(25 more words not shown)
- ELand claim suits(29 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
We've already predicted the main point: the Mashpee case shows the trouble that arises when a community's way of preserving information doesn't fit the court's expectations about proof. The lawsuit is our example of a broader cultural mismatch.
What we’re looking for
Look for that relationship, rather than a statement about just one requirement in this case.
Working the answers
- A
Written documentation was an obstacle here, but the ending describes growing accommodation of cultural differences. We aren't establishing that every successful land claim must include written records.
- B
The writer doesn't propose changing the definition of tribe. Allowing oral evidence to demonstrate self-government or territory would differ from changing what those requirements mean.
- CCorrect
The town demands documents; the Mashpee offer evidence preserved through an oral culture. Their unsuccessful suit illustrates the complications created by “differing perceptions and definitions” when cultures try to resolve a dispute.
- D
The courts aren't said to have promised to accept oral testimony and then refused it. The mismatch is between cultural approaches to evidence, not between a court's announced policy and its actions.
- E
An earlier ruling supplies the definition, so precedent does matter. But using precedent isn't itself the problem being illustrated. C captures what goes wrong: the different systems don't understand evidence in the same way.
More Main Point questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Main Point questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.