- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 101
- Section 4, Question 11
Many Native Americans view the archaeological excavation and(446 more words not shown)
According to the passage, which(11 more words not shown)
- AOnce a plaintiff's(19 more words not shown)
- BThe distinction between(11 more words not shown)
- CEven when a(23 more words not shown)
- DIn most such(17 more words not shown)
- ECommon law is(18 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
What do we remember about ancient graves? Standing is harder to establish. That's a useful starting prediction, but we'll still check the text: remembering that something was “difficult” won't help if we attach the difficulty to the wrong part of the legal process.
Working the answers
- A
The difficulty described is establishing standing, not resolving the case afterward. We aren't told how complicated litigation becomes once that first obstacle is cleared.
- B
Individual versus communal ownership is discussed, but we aren't told it is usually an issue in ancient-grave cases. A principle's inclusion doesn't establish how often it arises.
- C
Paragraph 2 offers property law as useful for claims to artifacts from ancient graves. It doesn't say that property law becomes unavailable in most cases even after standing has been established.
- DCorrect
Paragraph 1 says that for most ancient graves, recognizing standing would substantially extend existing common law. That supports the lack of a clear basis under current common law. It confirms our recollection, with the important qualification that the problem concerns standing.
- E
This asks how often people who already have standing use common law. We get no frequency for that. The last sentence of paragraph 1 says common law may support their claims; the standing obstacle doesn't tell us that such claimants rarely use it.
More Detail questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Detail questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.