PrepTest 156, Section 3, Question 11

DetailDifficulty1 of 5
Passage 2Paranormal phenomena and the limits of scientific evidence
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 156

Passage A is adapted from a book review(497 more words not shown)

Passage A(12 more words not shown)

Passage B(493 more words not shown)

Passage A, but not passage(3 more words not shown)

Reading the passage

This is a direct comparison of what is mentioned. We don't need to decide which writer is right or infer an unstated belief. Find the subject that appears in A and is absent from B.

Working the answers

  • A

    Both mention scientific experiments. A says attempts to study telepathy have failed; B cites repeated rigorous tests.

  • B

    Both discuss anecdotal evidence. A treats the collected stories as support; B says anecdotes need experimental verification.

  • C

    Both mention stress. A proposes it as a condition for paranormal events, and B includes it while describing Dyson's view.

  • D

    Both refer to reductionism. A defines the position, and B explicitly discusses Dyson's rejection of it.

  • E
    Correct

    A explains light's wave and particle behavior as the classic example of complementarity. B names and rejects applying complementarity to the paranormal, but never mentions that example of light's dual nature. Mentioning the principle is not the same as mentioning every illustration used to explain it.

More Detail questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Detail questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.