- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 146
- Section 4, Question 7
Most sociohistorical interpretations of art view a body(442 more words not shown)
Which one of the following(9 more words not shown)
- AHistorically, art was(25 more words not shown)
- BSociohistorical interpretations of(18 more words not shown)
- CHistorically, patrons of(25 more words not shown)
- DSociohistorical critics must(27 more words not shown)
- EThere have historically(17 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
We've already predicted the main point: treating art as a straightforward expression of an elite class's values misses important complications. The author distinguishes motives for patronage, identifies assumptions about shared values, and points to art that challenged the people who supported it.
What we’re looking for
Look for that overall criticism. Several answers may accurately describe one paragraph without explaining why the author brings all these points together.
Working the answers
- A
This captures part of the fourth paragraph: wealthy classes commissioned art, and their tastes did not always produce enduring works. It leaves out the broader criticism of how sociohistorical critics interpret that art.
- BCorrect
“Overly simplistic” fits the cumulative objection. Who financed a work does not settle whether it expresses a whole class's ideals: prestige, eccentric patrons and artist subversion can complicate that inference. B captures the point supported by the different paragraphs.
- C
The author distinguishes reputation-seeking from expressing ideals, but does not say patrons generally preferred the former to influencing art's development. Two possible motives do not establish which was more common. This also shifts the focus from the critics' interpretation to a broad claim about patrons' priorities.
- D
This describes the final complication: critics explain apparently contrary works as revealing hidden elite ideals. It is part of the criticism, not the whole point. The earlier distinction between motives and the assumptions about a shared worldview also matter.
- E
The second paragraph gives these two ways. But the author uses that distinction to develop a criticism of an interpretive approach. Stopping with the distinction leaves out what the rest of the discussion does with it.
More Main Point questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Main Point questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.