PrepTest 130, Section 2, Question 10

Author's OpinionDifficulty4 of 5
Passage 2Nature-inspired parallel computing
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 130

This passage was adapted from articles published in(459 more words not shown)

The passage most strongly suggests(9 more words not shown)

Reading the passage

Emeagwali thinks nature offers useful ideas for computing, and he expects other scientists to look there increasingly. We need a view his work or statements support. Our own skepticism about one of his claims doesn't become his opinion.

Working the answers

  • A
    Correct

    Trees have efficient branching structures; he adapts their underlying principle to improve a computing network. That is an example of a natural solution being useful for an analogous technical problem. The honeycomb design supplies another example of his approach.

  • B

    This is the opposite of his stated optimism. He claims his weather design will be powerful enough to predict patterns “a century in advance.” We may question that claim, but he doesn't express B's limitation.

  • C

    “Increasingly” doesn't mean more than half of all designs. Nature-inspired designs could become more common while remaining a minority.

  • D

    Nothing predicts their use for routine jobs. A system suited to complex oil-flow calculations needn't become the practical choice for ordinary computing.

  • E

    Oil-flow prediction is one use of the tree-based design. The text doesn't rank it as the structure's primary use. The fact that the principle helps distribute calculations doesn't remove its oil-field application; the unsupported claim is that this application comes first.

More Author's Opinion questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Author's Opinion questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.