- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 121
- Section 2, Question 24
Leading questions—questions worded in such a way as(469 more words not shown)
Which one of the following(10 more words not shown)
- AIn witnessing what(14 more words not shown)
- BWhich aspects of(13 more words not shown)
- CCan the stress(16 more words not shown)
- DDo different people(9 more words not shown)
- EWhen is it(13 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
We need a question the account actually gives us enough information to answer. Several topics could be interesting to research, but that doesn't make them topics addressed here.
Working the answers
- A
The robbery illustrates a detail that could be legally important. It doesn't establish which types of crimes make people pay especially close attention to circumstantial details.
- B
No reluctance to testify is explained. The issue is the accuracy of what a witness remembers and reports.
- C
Courtroom stress isn't investigated as a cause of memory errors. Don't substitute that plausible concern for the effects of leading questions.
- D
We aren't comparing the memory abilities of different people. We're considering factors that make a remembered detail more vulnerable to alteration.
- ECorrect
Timing provides an answer: the farther someone is removed from an event, the greater the chance of vague or incomplete recollection. A more recent event is therefore more likely to be remembered accurately, other things being equal. The discussion of attention and central versus tangential details also identifies relevant conditions.
More Detail questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Detail questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.