PrepTest 121, Section 2, Question 1

Main PointDifficulty1 of 5
Passage 1Reassessing stability in multipolar and bipolar systems
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 121

Social scientists have traditionally defined multipolar international systems(464 more words not shown)

Which one of the following(9 more words not shown)

Reading the passage

We've already predicted the main point: the familiar association of multipolarity with stability and bipolarity with conflict needs another look. The later examples challenge that contrast. I want an answer about reassessing it, not just a description of Europe or one historical event.

Working the answers

  • A

    This prescribes a new bipolar system as the only way to preserve peace. The writer calls for reconsidering the theories, not adopting this necessary policy solution.

  • B

    We aren't told that all international systems eventually collapse. The discussion questions assumptions about two kinds of systems; it doesn't declare every arrangement doomed.

  • C

    Europe's emerging multipolarity sets up the problem, but the writer stresses why its effects may differ from those of the Concert of Europe. Describing a strong resemblance misses that challenge.

  • D

    The World War II connection supports the broader reassessment. It isn't the whole point, and saying multipolarity is incompatible with a stable modern Europe is stronger than the warning that it may reduce security.

  • E
    Correct

    This states the two assumptions and the need to reconsider them in light of post–Cold War conditions. It captures what the historical comparisons and discussion of modern weapons are being used to establish.

More Main Point questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Main Point questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.