- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 119
- Section 1, Question 26
Many legal theorists have argued that the only(473 more words not shown)
Which one of the following(19 more words not shown)
- Aa rule requiring(27 more words not shown)
- Ba rule requiring(25 more words not shown)
- Ca rule requiring(24 more words not shown)
- Da rule requiring(22 more words not shown)
- Ea rule requiring(16 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
The second paragraph's problem is that people can endanger each other by making incompatible choices. If you were alone on a road, either side would work. Once other drivers are there, everyone needs a shared arrangement.
What we’re looking for
I want another rule that organizes people's movements or activities to prevent that kind of collision. A rule doesn't match merely because it requires everyone to do the same thing.
Working the answers
- A
Requiring permission before digging concerns authority over the site. The stated rule isn't arranging different people's activities so they don't interfere dangerously with one another.
- B
Requiring a prescription controls access to medicine. It doesn't solve a problem created by people making incompatible choices about where or how to act together.
- C
Requiring support for advertising claims addresses potentially misleading claims. The problem isn't a lack of an agreed convention like a side of the road.
- D
Matching uniforms provide conformity, but no comparable danger from uncoordinated activity is identified. Looking alike isn't the benefit that justifies the driving rule.
- ECorrect
Each pilot's altitude choice matters because other planes occupy the same airspace. Assigning different altitudes prevents dangerous interference among them. That's the same relationship as a road convention: the rule coordinates otherwise independent choices so people don't collide.
More Analogy questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Analogy questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.