- Home
- LSAT explanations
- Drill sets
- Question 5
This passage is adapted from a book published(425 more words not shown)
It can most reasonably be(20 more words not shown)
- Aoften causes witnesses(3 more words not shown)
- Busually disguises the(7 more words not shown)
- Cis often consciously(6 more words not shown)
- Doften causes jurors(3 more words not shown)
- Esometimes makes jurors(8 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
Brakel treats the fuller range of live cues as an advantage. His critics challenge that assumption: a juror can receive more information and still make a less reliable judgment. My expectation is an answer about cues misleading the jury, rather than automatically revealing who is honest.
Working the answers
- A
The concern is how jurors interpret witnesses, not that the cues make witnesses contradict themselves.
- B
The discussion doesn't establish that cues usually hide evidence of perjury. It allows misleading signals without claiming that this happens in most cases or always conceals an actual lie.
- C
Witnesses needn't consciously exploit the cues for the problem to arise. The text describes innocent anxiety that can be misread, not a pattern of deliberate manipulation.
- D
Overload and stereotyping aren't the same as complacency. We aren't told that jurors become satisfied and stop worrying about accuracy.
- ECorrect
Anxiety about a suspicious audience can look like the familiar cues associated with lying (paragraph 3). A witness may be nervous because testifying is intimidating, even while telling the truth. A juror who mistakes that nervousness for dishonesty would make exactly the error described here.
More Detail questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Detail questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.