PrepTest 127, Section 4, Question 25
During most of the nineteenth century, many French(465 more words not shown)
According to the passage, the(12 more words not shown)
- Aeveryone should both(3 more words not shown)
- Bmales and females(6 more words not shown)
- Ceducation should involve(2 more words not shown)
- Dreligious schools should(2 more words not shown)
- Eeducation for girls(6 more words not shown)
Reading the passage
Distinctive compared with what? We're looking for what set the second proposal apart, not merely a reform that sounds consistent with it. The text supplies an unusually direct clue: it alone among contemporary proposals called for coeducational schools (paragraph 2).
Working the answers
- A
The first proposal already allowed both sexes to learn and teach. And allowing teachers to be drawn from both sexes isn't requiring every person to teach.
- BCorrect
Coeducational schools are schools attended by both males and females. That is the feature explicitly identified as unique.
- C
Lifelong learning isn't discussed.
- D
Challenging gender roles enforced by religious tradition doesn't establish a proposal to abolish religious schools.
- E
Public schooling and replacement of predominantly religious curricula are already features of the first proposal. They don't identify the second proposal's stated distinction.
More Detail questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Detail questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.