- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 116
- Section 3, Question 24
Human resources director: While only some recent university(49 more words not shown)
If all of the statements(16 more words not shown)
- AAll people who(16 more words not shown)
- BAt least some(20 more words not shown)
- CAt least some(14 more words not shown)
- DAll people who(16 more words not shown)
- ENo one for(17 more words not shown)
Reading the argument
Who is 'all' talking about? Recent university graduates. The director doesn't say that everyone looking for a job cares about salary.
Keep each fact tied to its group. Some recent graduates care about work environment. All recent graduates care about salary, and all care about vacation policy. The people who care about stress level are a few veteran employees. We aren't given those veterans' views about salary, vacation, or work environment.
There isn't a conclusion here to challenge. The must-be-true question asks us to find a consequence of these facts. Accept the stated priorities even if yours are different. Then test the choices without letting a claim about recent graduates silently become a claim about all workers.
What we’re looking for
Strong wording isn't automatically wrong. For example, the passage would support saying that all workers who care about stress level are veteran employees. What matters is whether the particular group and claim are supported, not whether an answer contains 'all' or 'some.'
Working the answers
- A
All recent graduates care about salary, including the ones who care about work environment. But A covers everyone who cares about work environment. What about a retiree who takes a job to stay busy and wants pleasant surroundings, without caring much about the pay? That possibility leaves the stated facts intact and makes A false.
- BCorrect
Take the recent graduates who care about work environment. We know some exist. Every one of them also belongs to the larger group of recent graduates, all of whom care about vacation policy. So those particular people care about both.
We aren't guessing that two unrelated groups happen to overlap. The overlap is guaranteed because the graduates who care about work environment are already inside the group that universally cares about vacation. That establishes at least some people with both priorities.
- C
We know that a few veteran employees care about stress. We don't know whether any veterans disregard work environment. Perhaps every veteran considers it important. That possibility is consistent with the passage, so C doesn't have to be true.
- D
Caring about vacation doesn't identify someone as a recent graduate. Other workers may care about it too, and we don't know that all of those workers care about salary. A worker outside the recent-graduate group could value time off without considering pay important. D takes a connection established within one group and extends it to everyone with one of the group's priorities.
- E
What if a veteran employee cares about both stress and salary? The passage allows that. It identifies the workers who care about stress but never says those workers don't care about pay. Knowing that recent graduates care about salary doesn't make them the only people who do. E rules out an overlap we have no basis to rule out.
More Must Be True questions
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Must Be True questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.