PrepTest 152, Section 2, Question 6

Must Be TrueDifficulty2 of 5
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 152

Researchers studying athletes found that those who played(62 more words not shown)

Which one of the following(8 more words not shown)

Reading the argument

Someone who wants the trophy can still pay attention to the game.

That's the objection I'd raise if we were testing the proposed explanation. Enjoying a sport might encourage close attention, but wanting to win could motivate someone to concentrate too.

What we’re looking for

Here, though, we're asked what the statements support. The passage explains the sharper vision of athletes who mainly love the sport by connecting vision with attention to the activity itself. The supported connection is comparative: that group concentrates more on the sport itself.

Working the answers

  • A

    Winning could be important without being the main reason someone plays. An athlete might love the activity most and still care a great deal about a championship. A turns a difference in priority into the absence of a concern.

  • B

    Less sharp vision doesn't mean inadequate vision. Two athletes could both see well enough to play, with one seeing more sharply than the other. The passage compares the groups; it doesn't put every trophy-focused athlete below a minimum level of concentration or vision.

  • C
    Correct

    The explanation connects the first group's sharper vision to greater focus on the activity itself. C states that connection: athletes mainly motivated by love of the sport concentrate more on the sport than those mainly motivated by a trophy. It preserves the comparison instead of claiming the second group has no concentration at all.

  • D

    A tendency to focus more closely on one activity doesn't prove it is impossible to attend to anything else. The passage doesn't establish a strict limit on how many things an athlete can concentrate on at a time.

  • E

    Better vision isn't a guarantee of better overall performance. Imagine an inexperienced player concentrating intensely while a highly skilled opponent is somewhat distracted. The skill difference could still let the distracted player perform better. E turns one possible advantage into a claim about beating any athlete whose focus lies elsewhere, which the passage never establishes.

More Must Be True questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Must Be True questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.