- Home
- LSAT explanations
- PrepTest 152
- Section 1, Question 7
Editorial: Animated films appropriate for children are those(32 more words not shown)
Which one of the following(12 more words not shown)
- AFilms that are(6 more words not shown)
- BFilms that are(8 more words not shown)
- CFilms that have(4 more words not shown)
- DChildren enjoy films(6 more words not shown)
- EChildren do not(9 more words not shown)
Reading the argument
A dark theme isn't automatically a threatening film.
The editorial allows harmless cartoon mischief. A playful chase or prank could fit that description. But when it turns to the new adult films, it tells us about poverty and despair, then treats those subjects as disqualifying. We haven't been told that depicting those subjects makes a film threatening. A serious subject and a threatening treatment aren't necessarily the same thing.
What we’re looking for
To make the conclusion follow, connect the dark themes to the stated rule. If films with dark themes are threatening, these films fail the requirement that a children's film not be threatening. That's the missing link I'd look for.
Working the answers
- A
This tells us something about whimsical, mischievous films. It doesn't establish that the adult films with dark themes are threatening. We also shouldn't assume that a dark theme makes whimsy impossible; the editorial hasn't supplied that rule. A leaves the needed connection between dark themes and threatening content unstated.
- B
Seldom doesn't mean never. Even if adult-appropriate films are usually unsuitable for children, these particular films could be among the exceptions. And being aimed at adults isn't itself a guarantee that a film is appropriate for them. The question asks for an assumption that establishes the conclusion, not a general tendency that might make it more plausible.
- CCorrect
These films have dark themes, and C says films with dark themes are threatening. The editorial's rule excludes threatening films from the category appropriate for children. Together, those claims give us the conclusion: these films aren't appropriate for children.
- D
Whether children enjoy a film is a different question from whether it is appropriate for them. A child might enjoy something unsuitable, or dislike something suitable. A rule linking enjoyment to animation doesn't tell us whether these animated films violate the editorial's standard.
- E
Missing some details doesn't establish that the films are inappropriate. It also doesn't tell us whether the films are threatening. Perhaps a detail goes over a child's head; we would still need the missing rule connecting these dark themes to the standard the editorial applies.
More Sufficient Assumption questions
- PrepTest 152, Section 4, Question 3Sufficient Assumption
- Logical Reasoning Drill Set 10, Question 1Sufficient Assumption
- Logical Reasoning Drill Set 12, Question 4Sufficient Assumption
- Logical Reasoning Drill Set 13, Question 1Sufficient Assumption
- Logical Reasoning Drill Set 3, Question 7Sufficient Assumption
Learn the LSAT our way
Our platform drills Sufficient Assumption questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.