PrepTest 152, Section 1, Question 7

Sufficient AssumptionDifficulty1 of 5
The questionFull text in your LawHub copy of PrepTest 152

Editorial: Animated films appropriate for children are those(32 more words not shown)

Which one of the following(12 more words not shown)

Reading the argument

A dark theme isn't automatically a threatening film.

The editorial allows harmless cartoon mischief. A playful chase or prank could fit that description. But when it turns to the new adult films, it tells us about poverty and despair, then treats those subjects as disqualifying. We haven't been told that depicting those subjects makes a film threatening. A serious subject and a threatening treatment aren't necessarily the same thing.

What we’re looking for

To make the conclusion follow, connect the dark themes to the stated rule. If films with dark themes are threatening, these films fail the requirement that a children's film not be threatening. That's the missing link I'd look for.

Working the answers

  • A

    This tells us something about whimsical, mischievous films. It doesn't establish that the adult films with dark themes are threatening. We also shouldn't assume that a dark theme makes whimsy impossible; the editorial hasn't supplied that rule. A leaves the needed connection between dark themes and threatening content unstated.

  • B

    Seldom doesn't mean never. Even if adult-appropriate films are usually unsuitable for children, these particular films could be among the exceptions. And being aimed at adults isn't itself a guarantee that a film is appropriate for them. The question asks for an assumption that establishes the conclusion, not a general tendency that might make it more plausible.

  • C
    Correct

    These films have dark themes, and C says films with dark themes are threatening. The editorial's rule excludes threatening films from the category appropriate for children. Together, those claims give us the conclusion: these films aren't appropriate for children.

  • D

    Whether children enjoy a film is a different question from whether it is appropriate for them. A child might enjoy something unsuitable, or dislike something suitable. A rule linking enjoyment to animation doesn't tell us whether these animated films violate the editorial's standard.

  • E

    Missing some details doesn't establish that the films are inappropriate. It also doesn't tell us whether the films are threatening. Perhaps a detail goes over a child's head; we would still need the missing rule connecting these dark themes to the standard the editorial applies.

More Sufficient Assumption questions

Learn the LSAT our way

Our platform drills Sufficient Assumption questions at your level and adjusts as you improve.

See plans and pricing

HFL LSAT Advisor

Online

Hi! I'm HFL's LSAT advisor.

Tell me your score and goal and I'll point you to the right plan — or ask me anything.